<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Gulp</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.jeckecko.net/blog/2007/06/06/gulp/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.jeckecko.net/blog/2007/06/06/gulp/</link>
	<description>Precious little about anything…</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Mar 2009 19:36:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: James Box</title>
		<link>http://www.jeckecko.net/blog/2007/06/06/gulp/#comment-29</link>
		<dc:creator>James Box</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 16:37:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeckecko.net/blog/2007/06/06/gulp/#comment-29</guid>
		<description>Fanboy</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Fanboy</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Annett</title>
		<link>http://www.jeckecko.net/blog/2007/06/06/gulp/#comment-28</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Annett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 16:33:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.jeckecko.net/blog/2007/06/06/gulp/#comment-28</guid>
		<description>In their defence, these terms would be necessary to allow them licence to show your submitted content on their site. However, it&#039;s the &#039;right to sublicence&#039; and &#039;incorporate into other works&#039; which really opens the gates for them to do anything you like with any of your content.

I wonder if  &quot;when you post User Content to the site&quot; includes when their API fetches content from other sources. Does this then grant them license to reuse your Flickr photos, your Twitter tweets, and your blog posts? They can be shown on your profile even though you never manually submit the content to Facebook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In their defence, these terms would be necessary to allow them licence to show your submitted content on their site. However, it&#8217;s the &#8216;right to sublicence&#8217; and &#8216;incorporate into other works&#8217; which really opens the gates for them to do anything you like with any of your content.</p>
<p>I wonder if  &#8220;when you post User Content to the site&#8221; includes when their API fetches content from other sources. Does this then grant them license to reuse your Flickr photos, your Twitter tweets, and your blog posts? They can be shown on your profile even though you never manually submit the content to Facebook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

